It was thought as a replacement for advertisements. Instead of being overwhelmed by ads, a user visiting a site using this script would lend part of their processor cycles to mine for Bitcoins while surfing on the site.
In the case of Tidbit, the saga came to an abrupt end when in December that same year the New Jersey Attorney General’s office issued a subpoena to Rubin and Tidbit. All said and done, the Tidbit project was canceled. You can read more about it here.
The user must be in control
This control could be by using HTML5 instead, putting the browser in control of who gets to mine Bitcoins and how many at the same time – in order to prevent every site from mining at the same time and making the computer deadly slow.
A user could potentially say no to mining altogether and get served ads instead.
A new way to perform online commerce…
In fact. Why stop at replacing ads with this kind of technology? In essence, it could be used to pay for online content of any kind. Even make purchases (however at that point we’re blurring the line between mining for bitcoins and having one’s own Bitcoin wallet).
…and perhaps a new way to decrease the power usage of Bitcoin?
According to motherboard.vice.com, the usage of 1 Bitcoin could rake up as much as the whole power consumption for 1.5 American households, so decentralizing the mining might be one way to solve that problem.
However, others argue that the whole technical architecture of Bitcoin won’t be able to handle such amounts of transactions, that in fact, the whole currency is doomed.
The crucial question is, of course, if a browser based distributed computing platform could outperform other solutions on the capacity and electricity consumption scales.
Header image: used and modified under Creative Commons license thanks to BTCKeychain